Reading: Teams and Teamwork
Teams and teamwork
Answers and an explanation for each question appear once you add this activity to your own library.
How to use this lesson
For the Teacher
Set an 18-minute countdown and have students complete the 10 questions individually without dictionaries.
Review answers by projecting the explanations and discussing why surface word matching leads to wrong options.
For the Learner
First, skim the four paragraphs A to D in two minutes to understand the main topic and structure.
Next, underline keywords in each question and locate exact evidence in the text before selecting your answer.
What Makes a Team Work Well
Read the passage below and answer Questions 1–10.
Google studied 180 of its own teams: 115 project teams in engineering and 65 small sales groups, which it calls pods. It describes this research in a guide that it first published in 2015.
Google's researchers named five dynamics of effective teams: psychological safety, dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact. They found that what mattered was less who was on the team and more how the team worked together.
In 2010 the journal Science published a study in which researchers placed 699 people in groups of two to five and gave them tasks to do together. The average and the maximum intelligence of the members were not strongly linked to how well a group did. Groups did better when the members had higher social sensitivity and when one person did not dominate the talking.
The writer's own cautious view, hedged ('I think', 'it seems'): these facts seem to show that a team is more than a list of clever people, and I think both studies suggest that how people work together matters a lot. Google studied only its own teams, and the groups in 2010 were small and worked on set tasks, so the facts here do not show that the same results hold for every team or every workplace.
Questions 1–3
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in the text?
1 How members interact with one another is more critical to team performance than who those individual members are.
2 Groups evaluated in the 2010 study performed best when they included at least one member with exceptional intelligence.
3 Google spent multiple years researching its teams before publishing its guide in 2015.
Questions 4–5
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
4 According to the 2010 study in the journal Science, teams achieved superior outcomes when
5 What is the writer's perspective regarding the applicability of both studies?
Questions 6–7
Which paragraph contains the following information? Choose the correct letter, A–D.
6 a specific internal term used to refer to compact sales teams
7 interpersonal qualities that enabled experimental groups to work together more effectively
Questions 8–10
Complete the summary below. Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Understanding Group Performance
Google examined 180 of its internal teams and later made its findings available in a [ Question 8 ] released in 2015.
Among the five dynamics outlined, the researchers highlighted [ Question 9 ] alongside dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact.
Overall, the writer observes that a thriving group cannot simply be viewed as an assemblage of [ Question 10 ], because how individuals collaborate remains decisive.
Related lessons
Collective Nouns and Subject-Verb Agreement
Teams and teamwork
Grammar · 12 min
IELTS Speaking: Teams and Teamwork
Teams and teamwork
Speaking · 30 min
Vocabulary: Teams and Teamwork
Teams and teamwork
Vocabulary · 20 min
Writing Skills: Teams and Teamwork
Teams and teamwork
Writing · 55 min
Reading: Why Habits Are Hard to Change
Health & fitness
Reading · 18 min
Reading: Company Memo on Hybrid Working
Work & careers
Reading · 12 min