B2CEFRListening12 min

Listening: When Tree Planting Fails

Environment

Add to my libraryFree for teachers. You sign in only when you add the lesson.

Answers and an explanation for each question appear once you add this activity to your own library.

B2 | Listening from video | 12 min

Watch the video (0:07 - 5:19). You can watch more than once, then answer the questions.

What did a recent analysis conclude about Chile's tree planting between 1974 and 2012?

____ It greatly increased the amount of carbon stored____ It led to no major gains in carbon storage____ It mainly helped restore recently damaged forests

A NUMBER from the video.

The Bonn Challenge aims to restore ____ million hectares of degraded land by 2030.

What did the Oxfam analysis say about the tree planting goals of four big oil and gas producers?

____ They would need land twice the size of the UK____ They would need only a small area of land____ They are already close to being achieved

Most of Chile's tree planting money was used to restore native forests.

____ True____ False____ Not Given

A NUMBER from the video.

On average, natural forests store carbon about ____ times better than plantations do.

Why are pine and eucalyptus plantations a risk for carbon storage?

____ They absorb very little carbon when they are young____ They need much more water than native trees____ They burn very easily, so stored carbon can be lost

Most of the savanna land chosen for tree planting in Africa is privately owned.

____ True____ False____ Not Given

ONE OR TWO WORDS from the video.

In a savanna, most of the carbon is stored ____ where it is protected from fire.

According to the speaker, what is one more reason planting trees can be a bad idea?

____ Trees take too long to be counted by scientists____ Companies can use it to look green without real results____ Local people usually refuse to look after new trees

Related lessons